Dear C,
You may be glad to hear that the ‘New Man’ is alive and kicking – here in England, at least. You can spot him in the playground with his children every evening (looking rather defeated and out of place in his pin-striped suit), and at the supermarket every weekend, looking decidedly bewildered as he attempts to wrestle with the cart, his kids, and his wife’s complex Tampax requirements at one and the same time.
UK Man circa 2005 would never make hubby’s egregious mistake of claiming to be the captain of his familial ship, having learned from Britain’s post-colonial experience that The Man is the basic root of all evil in this world. He knows his place, which is queuing up behind the other dads to change his toddler’s nappy in the bathroom at Mcdonald’s, and demonstrating his opposition to all acts of domination, by losing in the first round of Wimbledon.
Lest you find yourself hopping on the next plane to Blighty, however, dear C, I am here to reassure you that all is not bliss in this misty isle. UK Man may never open a door for you, and will almost certainly insist on going dutch on the first date (although he would never call it that, ‘date’ being synonymous with commitment, of course, and therefore one of the shackles that capitalism creates to keep the proletariat in line). As for marriage, UK Man runs screaming in horror from such a meaningless capitalist construct (see above), vastly preferring, instead, to shack up and procreate, before leaving you with the fruit of your womb in your mid-forties, while he heads off to Thailand to ‘find himself’, along with a nubile seventeen-year old wife.
Given the obvious flaws in this example I have described above, dear C, do you think I have inadvertently hit upon the best argument yet for more women to enter the sciences, if only to build a better prototype?
Faithfully,
P.


