desperate in dc
desperate in dc

Archive for February, 2006

Snip Snip Clip Clip

February 13th, 2006 : No Comments »

P,

As it’s clear that hubby and I have far exceeded the natural limits of human tolerance and mangement capacity with four cherubs, I’m considering asking hubby to go under the knife to end his future reproductive capacity.  Although there are certainly methods I can use to avoid childbirth in the future (only some of which involve the word "no" and most of which involve menopause) I’ve realized there is a far larger worry to be considered: hubby’s unending potential for fathering children other than mine.

It’s not that hubby exhibits the classic signs of one likely to cheat, at least not on the surface.  It’s just that his well-ingrained midwestern nature, including both shame and guilt as overriding emotional components, make it less likely he would prepare for a moment in which he might encounter a willing partner.  Setting aside my dread of disease and dimemberment (his, if caught in such an act), it’s entirely possible, dearest P, that hubby could father other children well into his old age, a fact I find has more than the usual distate brought about by a Michael Douglas/Catherine Zeta Jones kind of relationship. 

Of course, one must also consider our dear family internist’s viewpoint, who recently suggested a vasectomy was a bad idea: who knew if hubby’s next wife, potentially still in high school, wants to bear his offspring as well–a matter only to be considered if the first family was, natually, tragically killed in a sudden and might I suggest, suspicious, accident.  I’ll of course follow-up later for the name of a new doctor, but I think his viewpoint gives me additional reason to act quickly: what if some of the cherubs survived and were cast aside by the step-monster in favor of her own offspring?

It is, therefore, with some urgency that I beg you to consider how I might convince hubby of my point of view.  Think of the cherubs, P, to whom I may already have denied the pleasure of abundance by their sheer numbers.  And let’s save the world from one more younger wife who gets all the benefit of the maturity we have yet to see in our spouses.

Faithfully,

C. 

Posted in Family Values

Re: Snip, Snip, Clip, Clip

February 13th, 2006 : No Comments »

C,

While I agree that you and hubby have done more than enough to re-populate the world, when it comes to my emasculating the oldballandchain, I suddenly find myself uncharacteristically reluctant to go for the snip.  Not that I am in any way condoning your internist’s point of view vis a vis preserving a man’s right to sow his seed well into his dotage, fourth wife permitting…….As a matter of fact, until recently, the obc has preferred to sleep with one eye open, lest he wake to find me looming over him with an oversize pair of pinking shears in my hand. 

Ever since the birth of your youngest, however, I find myself pining after babies the way I generally only lust after the pectorals of the hispanic youth who cuts my lawn.  Could it be that I am in fact not yet ready to hang the Out of Business sign on own my uterus?  As someone who only knows how to get pregnant by accident, not on purpose, I am not quite sure what to do with these feelings.  Do I lower the drawbridge and let the obc lay siege to my fortress, which for the past six years has remained stoutly impregnable?  Or do I add another lock to the old chastity belt and let this moment of temporary insanity pass?  The irony is, I would have to make this third pregnancy also look like an accident, since planned fatherhood is about the only thing the obc fears worse than the prospect of becoming a eunuch.

As a sometime mother of three, is it really true that three children are actually easier than two, or is this something only grandmothers tell you so they can have something to cackle over with their friends, once it’s too late?  I defer to your wisdom, as always.

Yours faithfully,

P.

Posted in Family Values

Mother Superior

February 10th, 2006 : No Comments »

C,

Still bent double from our early morning encounter with yoga yesterday, although having BS telling me to ‘open up, like a flower’ while he pressed down on my inner thighs during corpse pose made it all worthwhile.  Nevertheless, as part of my new resolve to a better parent – or at least appear to be one – I managed to hobble down to the bus-stop in time for the pre-work cocktail hour.  As a private school parent, you may not be familiar with this 15-30 minute time-slot during which working parents gather to discuss burning issues of the day, and otherwise postpone the moment when they must inevitably depart for work.  (Stay-at-home parents, of course, are generally far too busy to hang around.)

Anyway, one of the topics under discussion today appeared to be what kind and how many after-school activities are considered appropriate for a child between the ages of say, 0 and 11 – peak formative years for Harvard, you understand. When I mentioned that I was hesitating about whether or not to sign my offspring up for soccer, on the grounds that their once weekly gym class would serve as more than enough fun for one week, one mother, in particular, turned to me in horror.  ‘Fun, it seems, is absolutely not the point in life: not now, not ever.  Our children are to be moulded into a race of super-humans, ready to take over the world at a moment’s notice, thanks to all the hours of extra-curricular tuition in ancient Sanskrit, Mandarin Chinese and Russian, not to mention figure-skating training for the 2010 Winter Olumpics, all of which are apparently critical for successful world domination.

Mother Superior made it quite clear that she regards my lax stay-at-home mothering and moronic offspring as objects of pity, to be left in the dust, no doubt, the minute her second child is admitted to Squidwell. Silly me, I thought the point of life was to be happy!  It seems that Mother Superior has not only read every parenting book under the sun (indeed, she may have mentioned writing some of them), but she is able somehow to schedule all these activities for her children, and singlehandedly run the Department of  Labor at the same time – or so she implied.

I was tempted to point out that while Mother Superior may indeed be smarter, better educated and WAY more successful than yours truly, she certainly doesn’t know s*** about fashion.  The fetching silk shirt she had on looked like it had recently been ironed – by the wheels of a bus – while she appears to be allowing her hair – gasp! – to gray naturally.  I would offer my considerable skills as a makeover artist, honed during many extracurricular hours’ careful study of Us Weekly, but I fear that would only serve to make her attractive, as well as insufferable.

Instead, I returned chastened to apply my weekly face-mask in my humble abode.  I may not rule the world, but at least my pores won’t resemble the craters on the face of the moon.

Faithfully,

P.

Posted in Motherz in the Hood

Re: Mother Superior

February 10th, 2006 : No Comments »

P,

What you may not know about Mother Superior, whom I used to pity until I realized she harbored the same emotion for me, is two well-kept secrets, one of which I know b/c I too work such long hours outside the home: 1) her desk job is a terrifically useful perch for scheduling her children to do so many things, all you understand, executed and chauffered by others; and 2) she has, perhaps, three sticks of furniture in her home, two of which may be laundry baskets turned upside down for sitting. 

I must confess a certain envy of someone who clearly cares so little about what others think and spends her time doing exactly what she believes is important (even if her own childhood was shaped by an incident involving duct tape and a calculus book).  My envy, however, has turned to pure hate as MS recently made explicit that I was wasting my own few and precious I.Q. points (and those of my cherubs) by trying to decide upon a dining room set while I could be aiding eldest cherub in researching his science fair project.  Now, of course, it’s war.  It is, to be sure, a covert operation.  Whenever the chance presents, I simply offer her darlings a chance to watch Cops or play dodgeball in our front yard, activities which will  never enhance their resumes.

Oh, and I hope you don’t mind, but I have started luring your little ones into an enforced reading period when they come round.  They just seem to crave the structure, frankly.  Simply reinforces the notion that it really does take a village, doesn’t it P?   

Faithfully,

C.

Posted in Motherz in the Hood

A Most Startling Discovery

February 9th, 2006 : No Comments »

P,

Returned home from exercise this a.m. to a remarkable scene: three children, a baby and a husband saluting me at the door.  I promptly saluted back and released the olders to their father’s care for transport to school and took the youngers in hand for whatever it is we spend our day doing until the au pair is available for duty. 

I am fairly certain they intended to mock my perceived desire for order and cooperation in the morning.  The plan, of course, has backfired.  I will now require such a morning line-up, especially on mornings I am fully in charge. Hubby always claimed I missed my calling as an Army General (no lesser rank to be sure!) in charge of logistics. Perhaps Iraq is less well-served b/c of my childbearing decision.  Maybe I can’t have it all but why not run my home in a way that is a perfect fit with my missed career opportunities?  After all, if momma ain’t happy, ain’t nobody gonna be happy in this house.

Ten hut,

C.

Posted in Family Values