desperate in dc
desperate in dc

Archive for May, 2005

The Story of O

May 31st, 2005 : No Comments »

P,

I’ve been meaning to ask whether you’ve followed the recent controversy over whether women’s orgasms are, evolutionarily speaking, obsolete.  And I thought it was just in my bedroom.  Although I am reticent to discuss a subject that would seem to attract so much male interest, I find myself drawn to the topic like a moth to a flame.  It may not be in my self-interest, P, but I think for millions of dollars in grant money, I could prove an equally compelling corollary theory, that is, she who rocks his world controls his wallet. 

You do know I am loathe to drag out my women’s studies credentials, but I wonder, really, whether the "O" controversy only attempts to provide the male with yet another excuse to subjugate female desires in far more important areas.  It is clear, however, P, based on my own failed experiment in feminism, that conceding sex as a man’s domain may ultimately lead to total control over the purse strings.  And although I may be willing to give up pleasure in bed, I will never give up my right to shop. 

I do, suppose, dearest P, that we may simply teach our daughters what we know all too well–a satisfied man has no idea where his wallet lies.  But a sexually frustrated woman always does.  Sure, we could teach them that their own economic freedom would solve the issue entirely, but in case that doesn’t work out, they will at least know the rules of the game, won’t they? 

Faithfully,

C.

Posted in Sex in the Suburbs

Re: The Story of O

May 31st, 2005 : No Comments »

Dear C,

I’m not sure your Women’s Studies alums would approve of your interesting scientific hypothesis, but the romantic symmetry of the arrangement you describe certainly brings tears to this woman’s eyes.  Personally, I thought the female orgasm fell under the category of ‘nice if both parties are prepared to put in the work, but frankly, who has the time?’  Now I see what I must do on these less than satisfactory occasions: reach for his credit card and hit the real big O – Overstock.com.  (Wouldn’t it be nice if technology could just take over for both ends of the bargain once and for all?)

Your inspired explanation also takes care of the issue I had with the scientific assumption that there is no evolutionary need for women to be ‘in the mood’ before propagating the species, while for men it is the whole point.  Clearly, a sexually-frustrated woman is more in charge of her shopping wits, while a sexually-satisfied male can be easily relieved of his cash.  What better scenario could there be for ensuring a mutually-satisfying outcome for both parties?

QED,

P.

Posted in Sex in the Suburbs

A Whole New Word

May 27th, 2005 : No Comments »

Dear C,

I have discovered a wonderful new word in my vocabluary – one whose monosyllabic bluntness I confess fills me with a heady thrill. I am speaking, of course, of the word ‘No’ – a term hitherto  reserved for combatting the oldballandchain’s incessant  marital demands. Yesterday, I employed this exotic term no less than twice – first, in refusing to take care of a new classmate of my eldest, whose single working mother asked if her daughter could come over to our house every day after school; and secondly, in refusing to drive over to the house of my youngest’s best friend, who had forgotton her homework and wanted to copy my daughter’s.

Of the two, I must confess to finding most pleasure in sticking it to the latter, a singularly pushy child who will no doubt have a long and successful career in DC politics one day. However, lest you fear I am about to embark on a career specializing in thwarting the desires of harmless eight-year olds, let me add that I have since branched out into nixing the demands of the adult world, also.  Only yesterday, I declined to assist the school PTA president in her scheme to enlist volunteers to help clean up the sorely neglected school grounds. No doubt, it would save all those parents with Important Careers thousands of tax dollars to have people like me do it for nothing, but, as I explained to her on the phone, I am far too busy scheduling my next pedicure and massage appointments to possibly spare the time. 

I feel confident, dear C, that you will be able to supply my daughters with the requisite recommendations should the need arise, as it may shortly, to get them into private school.

Faithfully,

P.

Posted in Family Values

Re: A Whole New Word

May 27th, 2005 : No Comments »

P,

I must admit to undying admiration for your newest policy positions.  I only wonder whether you will soon apply this vocabulary to your own children.  It is becoming harder to deny that my cherubs don’t notice the ever-widening disparity between the mothering down the street and that which they receive at this address.  I am somewhat concerned that saying no to others may only encourage you to treat your children’s demands as an even higher priority–clearly jeopardizing my ever hardening parenting positions of, "Not now, not ever," as well as its closely related corollary, "Because I said so."

Now, you may think it is clearly unfair for me to expect you to follow my philosophical leanings just because we share the same block, but you really must think of all of our children as one larger family.  For me, really, it’s as if we lived in a commune (without spouse swapping to be sure) or a communist society with totalitarian leanings in which the fate of one must closely follow the others.  If not, revolt is certain–and frankly, with the sheer numbers I have in my home, your own security will surely be threatened.

So, while I embrace your baby steps, I only plead for additional movement in the direction of my own "tough love" philosophy where dogs, husbands and children are concerned.  Would love to chat more, but I need to pull hubby out of our new minivan.  He seems to have fallen for the voice of the woman who controls the navigational system.  At least the new vehicle has a quite large rear end, so I don’t worry that he will make a long-term commitment.

Faithfully,

C.   

Posted in Family Values

Pursuit of Beauty?

May 26th, 2005 : No Comments »

P,

Although my parenting philosophy may be somewhat narcissistic, I have taken another approach altogether with my beauty routine.  Don’t know if I’ve mentioned T., my Russian hairdresser (will save A., the tortuous waxer for another day).  Although I desperately want her to believe I have a certain stylish cache, she spends most of the time telling me why my hair is a disaster and my aging self is troubling at best.  And I love it.

Just yesterday I mentioned that I wanted a new ‘do.  After her initial disapproving look, she mentioned that I could look "somewhat" younger if I cut my hair shorter.  She made certain to mention that husbands don’t like short hair and I was risking my marriage.  Of course, for the trendiest style, I was willing to do it.  I do love the short cut, but the honeymoon will inevitably end with my own first wash and style.  T is clearly unaware of hair issues that arise after the visit–when it can’t be tugged into submission by a bossy Euro minx.  It’s as if I don’t exist when I leave her shop.  And I love it.

The stunning piece de resistance–the pinnacle of tortuous treatment–occurred when I inquired about some shampoo for hubby.  T returned with a bottle of men’s shampoo–for gray hair.  Now, I ask you, dearest P, how did she know I was married to a man with more than a sprinkling of salt and pepper?  I would like to say she knows him, but she doesn’t.  P, she simply assumed, based on MY appearance, that hubby was a man of a certain age.  I’d like to think I simply look expensive and have the carriage of a woman who requires one of those much older men to support my habits.  However, as I found T’s shop in a pocket of Bethesda not known for its high end retail, she knows it’s just not true.  Her steady gaze said it all.  I took the shampoo.  Now hubby is forced to give up all vanity in order to cater to the relationship I have with T.  And I love it.

Faithfully,

C.   

Posted in Fashion