desperate in dc
desperate in dc

Archive for April, 2005

Re: Kissing Fools

April 27th, 2005 : No Comments »

P,

It seems quite likely, dear P, that the next generation has figured out how to have altogether too much sex without producing offspring.  Shocking idea, really, as we were raised to believe that one pleasurable moment should be saddled with years of toil and burden. 

I’ve decided to encourage my own cherubs to take such pleasure wherever it may exist.  This should be enough for them  to pledge a lifetime of celibacy.  Just to be safe, however, dearest P, I encourage you to batten down the hatches.   I have one pre-adolescent cherub ready to emerge from his youthful innocence.  I shudder to think he may take his mother’s advice and lure your own sweet girls into his inexperienced embrace (we really want much older predatory partners for them don’t we?).  Just remember that it’s never too early for Norplant and a basket of condoms by the door would certainly only be admired here in DC. 

Faithfully,

C.

Posted in Sex in the Suburbs

Independent Madness I

April 26th, 2005 : No Comments »

P,

As you may know, we’re applying third cherub to an independent school this year.  He is nearly five and his formal education can’t begin soon enough.  As older sister and brother are current attendees, I naively thought our next born (and only potential Harvard matriculator) might be a shoe-in.  How foolish and Midwestern are my sensibilities.

I found the application questions regarding his birth experience unsettling (could they possibly mean how it was for me?) but plowed ahead to questions of tv preference (decided against mentioning watching Cops as our number one family pastime).  Slightly rattled by request for geneology (unclear even to me!) and trust fund rights (it’s not that we as good parents aren’t trying to find one for him) not to mention parental potential for income improvement (if only we knew!) but hoped the playdate would see us through this harrowing ordeal.  You see, dear P, third cherub is slightly socially awkward and that, my friend, is sooo DC. 

The interview playdate, in the end, was uneventful except for a brief "overhugging" episode we will sort out later with his therapist.  Dearest P, the most amazing part of the whole process has been the incredible interest in our cherub of all other applicant parents we meet.  They always want to know his exact level of academic progress, musical instrument prowess and general enthusiasm for post-doctoral work.  Who wouldn’t find that charming? 

Gotta run, my friend, as third’s pre-algebra tutor promised to squeeze us in before he meets with the kindie teacher.  I do hope he’s able to demonstrate equations with the enthusiasm he has shown at home.

Faithfully,

C.   

Posted in Educating the Masses

Re: Independent Madness I

April 26th, 2005 : No Comments »

Dear C,

Are you quite sure the emphasis you place on your younger son’s educational achievements is not misguided, given that his ultimate success or not in getting into the school of your dreams must surely have been determined before he was even conceived? Forget the elective caesarian, the immediate post-partum tutorial with flashcards, and the breast-feeding you doubtless continue to this day; we all know the most important determinant of your child’s private school application is your choice of a mate.


To whit, if said son’s co-parent is not a) an aging member of the Washington establishment on their second or third family; b) a member of a disadvantaged social group or c) a woman, then he stands next to no chance of getting in. My advice to you now is simply to claim that your husband is, in fact, all of the above, and allege rampant discrimination if anyone dares to suggest otherwise. This, as you well know, dear C, is a private school application coordinator’s ultimate fear, and will quickly have them offering your son a full scholarship, no questions asked. And besides, I think hubby would look rather fetching in a dress.

Faithfully,

P.

Posted in Educating the Masses

Sex in the Workplace

April 25th, 2005 : No Comments »

Dear C,

Loath as I am to complain, I’m afraid the time has come to speak up on a matter close to my heart. As someone who’s husband is gainfully employed outside the home, you may not have to struggle with this issue. But for wife of the work-at-home husband, this dilemma is a specter that haunts us daily: namely, when is a good time to have sex? For most mothers of young children, I am sure, the safe answer is never, but for we wowahhs, the problem is compounded by the yawning discrepancy in the perception of the two parties involved. For our husbands, naturally, any time is a good time, but for the wife, of course, no time is convenient, seeing that she generally has her day planned down to the nanosecond with absolutely no time scheduled for fun, let alone multiple orgasms (or showers). And yet, to refuse, as she frequently must, is to spend the entire day consumed by a vague sense of worry about the state of her marriage, while the husband merely shrugs and moves on to Internet porn. The solution, dear C, would seem to be for one of us to go out, get a job, and confine sex to the office, like normal people. But in my case, I fear, this might interfere with shopping – I mean being there for the children, when they get home from school. As for the oldballandchain, I’m not sure he could cope with the bright glare of sunlight, let alone being forced to re-learn all those socialization skills, after so many years in his lair.

Faithfully,

P.

Posted in Sex in the Suburbs

Re: Sex in the Workplace

April 25th, 2005 : No Comments »

Dearest P,

Wasn’t it Betty Friedan who pointed out this very dilemma in The Feminine Mystique?  It is much better, she supposed, to fully emancipate oneself from one’s significant other and never actually have sex as this is the only true way to control the balance of power.  Of course, one might wonder with whom the S.O. is having sex, but you know good feminists can’t be bothered with these insignificant details.  I have instead a adopted a corollary of this promising but problematic theory: using sex as a weapon, I mean, of course, tool, for getting our "mutual" goals accomplished.  And by mutual, I mean, of course, mine.  For a husband who works from home, for example, you might prepare a list of daily chores (helpfully called "work" so as not to confuse the poor lad).  You might hand the list to him while attired in some lingerie (and granny panties don’t count), giving him a hint of what might follow completion of the list.  As we are dealing with men, you might have to spell it out: list done by 1pm, sex today (there’s no need to state the opposite result as we like to keep things positive).  If it all sounds rather daunting in the beginning as you have for so long been giving the milk away for free, don’t worry as, in my experience, men are much like children and their initial whining and tantrums will turn to compliance once your resolve is made clear.  I can’t wait to see the spiffed up homestead, P.  If I don’t see some immediate changes, I won’t blame you, but I may lose some respect.  The women’s studies certificate I earned in college really must count for something.

Faithfully,

C.       

Posted in Sex in the Suburbs